Author: eugenesv
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 12:47 pm (GMT -6)
And yet it has an option to have 0% to hide the second panel. So, obviously, hiding the second panel does not contradict the OFM concept.
All I'm asking for is for a better implementation of this feature when second panel is invisible it should be disabled so you couldn't interact with it (e.g. switch to it and wonder where your cursor disappeared) unless you make it visible again.
And it's not enough for me, hence this post. Just out of curiosity what % of your time in TC do you spend with 0% width (to be able to say whether it's enough or not or you just never use it for it to matter to you)?
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 12:47 pm (GMT -6)
| milo1012 wrote: |
| so it uses two panes/panels |
And yet it has an option to have 0% to hide the second panel. So, obviously, hiding the second panel does not contradict the OFM concept.
All I'm asking for is for a better implementation of this feature when second panel is invisible it should be disabled so you couldn't interact with it (e.g. switch to it and wonder where your cursor disappeared) unless you make it visible again.
| milo1012 wrote: |
| the width to 0% is completely enough for me. |
And it's not enough for me, hence this post. Just out of curiosity what % of your time in TC do you spend with 0% width (to be able to say whether it's enough or not or you just never use it for it to matter to you)?